Financing & funding
Price for one auto-disable (AD) syringe and needle
- As of October 2025, the UNICEF procurement price for 2026 ranges from US$ 0.023 to US$ 0.046, depending on supplier and product.Go to footnote 1
- The 2026 PAHO Revolving Fund for Access to Vaccines price ranges from US$ 0.03 to US$ 0.04, depending on supplier and product.Go to footnote 2
Price for one 5-litre safety box
- The UNICEF procurement price for 2026 ranges from US$ 0.375 to US$ 0.860, depending on supplier and product.Go to footnote 3
- The 2026 PAHO Revolving Fund for Access to Vaccines price ranges from US$ 0.41 to US$ 0.47, depending on supplier and product.Go to footnote 2
Each 5-litre safety box can hold around 100 syringes.
Hexavalent vaccine (hexa-wP)
As of October 2026, the UNICEF price per dose for countries eligible for Gavi pricing is US$ 2.85 in the 10-dose presentation.Go to footnote 4
For different groupings of middle-income countries (MICs), the UNICEF price per dose For SII's hexa-wP vaccine ranges from US$ 3.00 in the 10-dose to US$ 4.50 in the single dose presentations.Go to footnote 4
UNICEF prices are subject to change. The latest vaccine price information is available from UNICEF Supply Division.Go to footnote 4
The 2026 PAHO Revolving Fund vaccines pricelist reports a price per dose ranging from US$ 2.85 in the 10-dose to US$ 4.5 in the single-dose presentation.Go to footnote 5
For fully self-financing MICs, the country-reported price for 2025 per dose ranges from US$ 21.05 to US$ 39.73 depending on supplier and presentation.Go to footnote 6
Pentavalent vaccine (penta-wP)
As of January 2026, the UNICEF price per dose for countries eligible for Gavi pricing ranges from US$ 0.78 in the 10-dose to US$ 1.26 in the single-dose, depending on supplier.Go to footnote 7
UNICEF prices are subject to change. The latest vaccine price information is available from UNICEF Supply Division.Go to footnote 7
The 2026 PAHO Revolving Fund vaccines pricelist reports a price per dose ranging from US$ 1.31 to US$ 4.15 depending on supplier and presentation.Go to footnote 5
For fully self-financing MICs, the country-reported price for 2025 per dose ranges from US$ 1.21 to US$ 4.96 depending on supplier and presentation.Go to footnote 6
IPV vaccine
As of April 2026, the UNICEF prices per dose for countries accessing Gavi prices ranges from US$ 1.04 in the 5-dose presentation to US$ 2.8, in the single-dose presentation depending on supplier.Go to footnote 8
UNICEF price for self-procuring MICs is €3.5 per dose.Go to footnote 8
The 2026 PAHO Revolving Fund vaccines pricelist reports a price per dose ranging from US$ 1.18 to US$ 1.98 depending on supplier and presentation.Go to footnote 6
For fully self-financing MICs, the country-reported prices per dose for 2025 range from US$ 2.05 to US$ 12.33 depending on supplier and presentation.Go to footnote 6
In European countries with vaccine procurement through public tenders the price per child vaccinated with standard vaccines ranged from €59 to €117 when using pentavalent and from €98 to €220 when using hexa-aP vaccines.Go to footnote 9
A 2022 study focused on Peru estimated the total cost of fully vaccinating a child with the hexa-aP vaccine at $126.42, compared to US$ 116.27 under the existing schedule using the current scheme using the wP-containing pentavalent vaccines with IPV and OPV.Go to footnote 10
While hexavalent vaccines may have higher upfront costs, they can help reduce logistical challenges and overall societal burden, offering potential economic and practical benefits for immunization programs. The magnitude and direction of costs and savings are context dependent and vary according to current pentavalent and IPV vaccine presentations, wastage, cold-chain requirements, delivery platform, co-financing status, and whether the programme currently uses one or two IPV doses.
Studies from Peru (penta-wP compared to hexa-aP), Argentina (penta –wP compared to hexa-aP), Colombia (aP compared to hexa-wP), and South Korea (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB compared to DTaP-IPV/Hib) have reported potential economic and operational benefits of hexavalent vaccine use in specific programme contexts.Go to footnote 11, Go to footnote 12, Go to footnote 13, Go to footnote 14, Go to footnote 15, Go to footnote 16, Go to footnote 17
Cost–effectiveness varies considerably by several factors, including, the burden of disease, vaccination coverage, vaccine price, delivery costs, delivery approaches, and schedules. Caution is recommended when comparing estimates of cost-effectiveness for different interventions evaluated by different methods and in different contexts (e.g., with different concurrent health interventions and standards of care).
Scope of Gavi support: Hexavalent is supported by the guaranteed vaccine budget. All Gavi-eligible countries that have not yet introduced hexavalent into their national vaccination schedule are eligible for support for the three-dose whole-cell pertussis (wP) hexavalent vaccine. Adoption of hexavalent vaccine is implemented as a replacement for the existing pentavalent and IPV schedules. Gavi does not support procurement of routine bOPV.Go to footnote 18
Specific requirements for funding request: Within the holistic application, explain the timing and process of switching from pentavalent and IPV to hexavalent. Countries should allow 6–12 months between decision and planned launch.Go to footnote 18
Special co-financing considerations: Co-financing calculations will include a subsidy equivalent to the country’s IPV eligibility (one or two doses), based on the annual weighted average price of IPV. Fully self-financing lower-middle income countries (LMICs) are eligible for a temporary subsidy in 2026 to purchase hexavalent vaccines equivalent to their IPV eligibility (one or two doses), aligned with the annual weighted average IPV price. This subsidy will be reduced by 50% in 2027, and by 2028 LMICs will be required to fully finance their hexavalent vaccination programmes. For initial self-financing countries using ten‑dose pentavalent vials, switching to hexavalent is cost‑neutral, as both vaccines are co‑financed at US$ 0.20 per dose.Go to footnote 18
- Go back to footnote reference 1
UNICEF Supply Division (2025). Auto-disable (AD) syringes price data 2011-2027 . Copenhagen: United Nations Children’s Fund. October 2025(https://www.unicef.org/supply/documents/auto-disable-ad-syringe-price-data, accessed 24 June 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 2
Pan American Health Organization (2026). Revolving fund: Syringes and Safety Boxes 2026 Prices
. July 2026 (https://www.paho.org/en/documents/syringes-and-safety-boxes-2026-prices, accessed 24 September 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 3
UNICEF Supply Division (2025). Safety boxes price data 2011-2027. October 2025 (https://www.unicef.org/supply/media/24401/file/Safety-Boxes-SB-pricing-data-2011-2027.pdf, accessed 24 June 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 4
UNICEF (2026). DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib (hexavalent) vaccine price data. (https://www.unicef.org/supply/documents/dtwp-hepb-ipv-hib-hexavalent-vaccine-price-data, accessed 30 June 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 5
Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) (2026). Revolving fund vaccine prices. July 2026 (https://www.paho.org/en/documents/vaccine-prices-revolving-fund-2026, accessed 13 July 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 6
World Health Organization (WHO) (2026). 2025 MI4A vaccine purchase data. (https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/vaccine-access/mi4a/mi4a-vaccine-purchase-data, accessed 28 September 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 7
UNICEF Supply Division (2026). DTP-HepB-Hib (pentavalent) vaccine price data. January 2026. ( https://www.unicef.org/supply/documents/dtp-hepb-hib-pentavalent-vaccine-price-data, accessed 30 June 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 8
UNICEF Supply Division (2026). Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) price data
. April 2026 (https://www.unicef.org/supply/documents/inactivated-polio-vaccine-ipv-price-data , accessed 30 June 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 9
Salo, H., Sakalauskaitè, M., Lévy-Bruhl, D., Lindstrand, A., Valentiner-Branth, P., Wichmann, O. & Puumalainen, T. (2023). Prices of paediatric vaccines in European vaccination programmes. Vaccine X, 15, 100392. doi:10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100392.
- Go back to footnote reference 10
Seinfeld, J., Rosales, M.L., Sobrevilla, A. et al. (2022). Economic assessment of incorporating the hexavalent vaccine as part of the National Immunization Program of Peru. BMC Health Services Research, 22, 651. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08006-1.
- Go back to footnote reference 11
Seinfeld, J., Rosales, M.L., Sobrevilla, A. & López Yescas, J.G. (2022). Economic assessment of incorporating the hexavalent vaccine as part of the National Immunization Program of Peru. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 651. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08006-1.
- Go back to footnote reference 12
Olivera, I., Pérez, C.G., Lazarov, L., Lopez, E., Oddo, C. & Dibarboure, H. (2023). Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1067. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-10038-0.
- Go back to footnote reference 13
Romero, M., Góngora, D.-S., Caicedo, M.-L., Benchabane, D. & Lopez, J.-G. (2021). Cost-Minimization and Budget Impact Analysis of a Hexavalent Vaccine (Hexaxim®) in the Colombian Expanded Program on Immunization. Value in Health Regional Issues, 26, 150–159. doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2021.06.001.
- Go back to footnote reference 14
Min, S., Kwon, S.H., Lee, Y.W., Lee, J.M., Bae, E.J. & Lee, E.K. (2023). Estimating the Total Societal Cost of a Hexavalent Vaccine versus a Pentavalent Vaccine with Hepatitis B in South Korea. Vaccines (Basel), 11(5), 984. doi:10.3390/vaccines11050984.
- Go back to footnote reference 15
Olivera, M., Soto, J., Llamas, L.M., Reyes, N., Cid, M., et al. (2020) ‘Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine’, BMC Health Services Research, 20, p. 295. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05115-7.
- Go back to footnote reference 16
Aljunid, S.M., Ismail, A., Nor, N.M., Zafar, A., Suleiman, A., et al. (2022) ‘Economic impact of switching from partially combined vaccine “Pentaxim® and hepatitis B” to fully combined vaccine “Hexaxim®” in the Malaysian National Immunization Program’, BMC Health Services Research, 22, p. 34. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07428-7.
- Go back to footnote reference 17
Mogale, M., Burnett, R.J., Olivier, D., Mphahlele, J. (2014) ‘Economic assessment of implementing Hexaxim® vaccine within the South African Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI-SA)’, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 21(Suppl.), pp. 1–460 (Abstract, 16th ICID). (https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(14)01366-6/fulltext, accessed August 30, 2026).
- Go back to footnote reference 18
Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (2026). Gavi 6.0 Funding Guidelines v1.0 April 2026 (https://www.gavi.org/sites/default/files/support/guidelines-2026/gavi-60-funding-guidelines-annexes.pdf, accessed 24 June, 2026).