Supporting countries in establishing and strengthening NITAGs: Lessons learned from 5 years of the SIVAC initiative

Scientific publications
Multiple regions
Original Title
Supporting countries in establishing and strengthening NITAGs: Lessons learned from 5 years of the SIVAC initiative
Nyambat Batmunkh
Kamel Senouci
Alfred Da Silva
Alex Adjagba
Pape Coumba Faye
Brad Gessner
Robin Biellik
Antoine Durupt
Elsevier - Vaccine
Publication Year


To empower governments to formulate rational policies without pressure from any group, and to increasethe use of evidence-based decision-making to adapt global recommendations on immunization to theirlocal context, the WHO has recommended on multiple occasions that countries should establish National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs). The World Health Assembly (WHA) reinforced those recommendations in 2012 when Member States endorsed the Decade of Vaccines Global Vaccine ActionPlan (GVAP). NITAGs are multidisciplinary groups of national experts responsible for providing indepen-dent, evidence-informed advice to health authorities on all policy-related issues for all vaccines across allpopulations. In 2012, according to the WHO–UNICEF Joint Reporting Form, among 57 countries eligiblefor immunization program financial support from the GAVI Alliance, only 9 reported having a functionalNITAG. Since 2008, the Supporting Independent Immunization and Vaccine Advisory Committees (SIVAC)Initiative (at the Agence de Médecine Préventive or AMP) in close collaboration with the WHO and otherpartners has been working to accelerate and systematize the establishment of NITAGs in low- and middle-income countries. In addition to providing direct support to countries to establish advisory groups, theinitiative also supports existing NITAGs to strengthen their capacity in the use of evidence-based pro-cesses for decision-making aligned with international standards. After 5 years of implementation andbased on lessons learned, we recommend that future efforts should target both expanding new NITAGsand strengthening existing NITAGs in individual countries, along three strategic lines: (i) reinforce NITAG institutional integration to promote sustainability and credibility, (ii) build technical capacity withinNITAG secretariats and evaluate NITAG performance, and (iii) increase networking and regional collabo-rations. These should be done through the development and dissemination of tools and guidelines, and information through a variety of adapted mechanisms.

Related News & Events

  • Chile

    Chile's NITAG documents the results of the committee's evaluation


    In this article, we describe the structure, functioning and work processes of Chile’s NITAG (CAVEI) and assess its functionality, quality of work processes and outputs, and integration of the committee into the Ministry of Health policy process using the Assessment tool for National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups.

    Read more
  • NITAG training

    Read more on NITAG training in resource-constrained settings


    Antoinette Ba-Nguy and Adeel Shaah, ex-SIVAC staff and experienced NITAG trainers,  wrote an article on the NITAG trainings delivered through the Partnership for Influenza Vaccine Introduction (PIVI) program.

    Read more
  • SAGE

    new Interim Recommendations on Vaccination against Ebola Virus Disease from SAGE


    Over the last four weeks, the Ebola outbreak in the Eastern Provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has deteriorated with a large increase in the number of cases1. A major factor in this rise is an increase in critical security incidents that have dramatically affected the ability to identify, follow up and vaccinate contacts successfully. This context challenges the implementation of ring vaccination based on the identification of contacts and contacts of contacts, as recommended by SAGE in April 2017 and confirmed by SAGE during its April 2019 meeting. Further, a potential vaccine shortage may manifest in case the outbreak expands further and/or is prolonged.

    Read more